Okay, This Is Too Good Not To Share Right AwayNow, as many of you (all four of you) know, I have to take mass transit in the Twin Cities. What you may
not know is that I actually grew up taking the same wonderful, efficient bus-based mass transit system that has served the Twin Cities metropolitan area since the 1950s (/sarcasm), and that, prior to the advent of the buses, the area was served by one of the best, if, indeed, not THE best, streetcar system in the entire country,
Twin City Rapid Transit.
Now, understand that what was once an amazing network of
private streetcars was sold off just as the company was engaging in a system of reinvestment in the lines that would have provided stiff competition to the emerging buses of the 1950s, and the resulting transit fiasco was eventually put under the aegis of a regional entity known as the *ominous chord*...
Metropolitan Council.
Notice, if you will, that the Met Council answers to...NOBODY. From the article:
These powers can supersede decisions and actions of local governments. The legislature entrusts the Council to maintain public services and oversee growth of the state's largest metro area. This agency is similar to Metro in Portland, Oregon (see Metro (Oregon regional government)) in that both agencies administer an urban growth boundary.
The Council's role in the Twin Cities metro area is defined by the necessary regional services it provides and manages. These include public transportation, wastewater treatment, regional planning, urban planning for municipalities, forecasting population growth, ensuring adequate affordable housing, maintaining a regional park and trails system, and "provides a framework for regional systems including aviation, transportation, parks and open space, water quality and water management."[1]
But wait, you cry! It says right there that the Legislature controls the Council! What am I talking about? Ah, therein is the peril, for, you see...
The Met Council currently has 17 members, 16 of which represent a geographic district in the seven-county area with one chair who serves "at large." All members are appointed by the governor and are reappointed with each new governor in office. The Minnesota Senate may confirm or reject each appointment.
Bear in mind that the Minnesota Senate has been historically controlled by the Democrat-Farmer-Labor party for about as long as I can remember. If you think they're going to reject *anyone* who
wants to sit on this monstrosity, you're nuts.
So where am I going with this, you may be asking? That's a fair point. All right, here's the setup. As noted earlier, the Met Council is responsible for the vast majority of the bus service in the Twin Cities, and, back when Jesse Ventura *snickers* was Governor, ol' Jesse got a tax pushed through that redirected the way transit was funded;
traditionally, the state applied a tax to the licence renewal fees for every vehicle in the state of MN, and, the more expensive the vehicle, the more you forked over and the more cash went to fund buses as a result. However, Jesse didn't like having to pay more because he happened to own a Hummer, so, instead, for every
new car sold in the state, a percentage of the sales tax (which was, naturally for MN, increased) would go to fund transit instead.
Fast forward from 1998 to 2008. Auto sales are in the tank. Mass transit, which has been massively subsidized
anyway, because it can't pay for itself (being a branch of government rather than a private company), has reported its ridership levels are the HIGHEST in 27 years.
And yet, the chair of the Met Council, one Peter Bell, had the sheer gall, the unmitigated
nerve, to say, in his State Of The Region speech (side note: don't you just LOVE these "State Of The _______" speeches? :\) that not only did Metro Transit NEED to raid other budgets, it *also* needed Federal stimulus money just to keep in operation, AND (get this) there were NO plans to stop the Central Corridor Light Rail line or the North Star Corridor commuter rail line, which haven't even
started construction yet, as those have "already been budgeted for".
His money quote, though, and keep in mind that this man has no shame in demanding your hard-earned cash for nonexistent publicly-funded projects of dubious value, is this one, taken from the St. Paul Pioneer Press story and directly from his speech:
"It makes no sense to build what you can't afford to operate."
Get. Me. The. Cluebat.
I have some bureaucrat whackin' to do.